Quick Navigation
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW#1
A structured, comprehensive synthesis of research studies addressing a specific question, emphasizing reproducibility and transparency.
INTERVENTION#2
A specific treatment or strategy aimed at improving mental health outcomes, such as therapy or medication.
DATA EXTRACTION#3
The process of retrieving relevant information from selected studies to analyze and synthesize findings.
PEER REVIEW#4
A quality control process where experts evaluate a research paper before publication, ensuring validity and rigor.
METHODOLOGY#5
The systematic framework and techniques used to conduct research, including design, data collection, and analysis.
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE#6
Clinical practices that are informed by the best available research evidence, enhancing treatment effectiveness.
LITERATURE SEARCH#7
A comprehensive search for existing studies relevant to a specific research question, using various databases.
INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA#8
Set standards determining which studies are eligible for review based on specific characteristics.
DATA ANALYSIS#9
The application of statistical or qualitative methods to interpret extracted data and draw conclusions.
SYNTHESIS#10
The process of combining findings from multiple studies to generate overarching conclusions or recommendations.
RIGOROUS#11
A term describing thorough and meticulous research practices that ensure validity and reliability of findings.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH#12
Research focusing on understanding phenomena through non-numerical data, such as interviews and observations.
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH#13
Research that involves numerical data and statistical analysis to test hypotheses or measure variables.
META-ANALYSIS#14
A statistical technique that combines results from multiple studies to provide a more precise estimate of effect.
TRANSPARENCY#15
The practice of openly sharing research processes and findings to enhance trust and reproducibility.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS#16
Guidelines ensuring that research is conducted with integrity, respect for participants, and adherence to regulations.
CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK#17
Helpful criticism aimed at improving a research paper or project, fostering collaboration among peers.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS#18
Additional documents or data submitted alongside a research paper to provide further context or support.
JOURNAL GUIDELINES#19
Specific requirements set by academic journals that authors must follow when submitting their work.
COVER LETTER#20
A document submitted with a manuscript outlining its significance and suitability for publication.
MANUSCRIPT#21
The written document of a research paper that authors submit for publication consideration.
RESEARCH QUESTION#22
A clear, focused inquiry that guides the systematic review and defines its scope.
OUTCOMES#23
The results or effects of an intervention, typically measured to assess its effectiveness.
VALIDITY#24
The extent to which a study accurately reflects the concept it aims to measure, ensuring credible results.
REPRODUCIBILITY#25
The ability to replicate research findings under the same conditions, enhancing reliability.
SAMPLE SIZE#26
The number of participants or studies included in a research analysis, impacting the study's power and validity.