Quick Navigation

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW#1

A structured literature review that synthesizes research on a specific topic, following a predefined methodology.

LITERATURE ANALYSIS#2

The process of evaluating and interpreting existing research to derive insights and identify gaps in knowledge.

PUBLICATION WRITING#3

The practice of composing research articles that meet the standards of peer-reviewed journals for publication.

PEER REVIEW#4

An evaluation process where experts assess the quality and validity of research before publication.

RESEARCH ETHICS#5

Principles guiding the conduct of research to ensure integrity, respect, and accountability in scholarly work.

RESEARCH QUESTION#6

A clear, focused question that guides the research process and defines the scope of the systematic review.

DATA EXTRACTION#7

The process of collecting relevant data from selected studies to analyze and synthesize findings.

CRITICAL APPRAISAL#8

A systematic evaluation of research studies to assess their validity, relevance, and applicability.

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY#9

A list of citations for sources, accompanied by a brief summary and evaluation of each source.

BOOLEAN OPERATORS#10

Logical operators (AND, OR, NOT) used in database searches to refine search results.

MANUSCRIPT DRAFT#11

An initial version of a research article prepared for submission to a journal.

REVISION#12

The process of making changes to a manuscript based on feedback from peer reviewers or editors.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS#14

The integration of findings from multiple studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of a topic.

DATA MANAGEMENT#15

Organizing and maintaining data to ensure accuracy and ease of access during research.

JOURNAL GUIDELINES#16

Specific requirements set by academic journals regarding manuscript formatting and submission.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS#17

Additional documents or data provided alongside a manuscript to support the research findings.

RESEARCH PROPOSAL#18

A detailed plan outlining the objectives, methodology, and significance of a proposed research study.

CRITICAL THINKING#19

The ability to analyze and evaluate information critically, leading to informed conclusions.

VISUAL AIDS#20

Graphical representations of data (charts, graphs) used to enhance understanding of research findings.

REVIEWER COMMENTS#21

Feedback provided by peer reviewers on a manuscript, aimed at improving its quality before publication.

RESEARCH GAPS#22

Areas within a field of study where insufficient research exists, highlighting opportunities for further investigation.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY#23

The rigor and appropriateness of the methods used in a research study, impacting its reliability.

FEEDBACK MECHANISMS#24

Processes for receiving and incorporating input from peers and mentors during research.

PEER DISCUSSIONS#25

Collaborative conversations among researchers to share insights and critique each other's work.

PUBLISHABLE RESEARCH#26

Research that meets the standards and criteria necessary for acceptance by academic journals.